Shield Laws, Judicial Appointments, and Mandatory Recusals

Generally, as a matter of blogging fundamentals, I'm not a fan of the "round-up" post. But on the last Saturday in October, with the weather as nice as it is and my beloved Ole Miss Rebels on TV, it just wouldn't be right to spend the afternoon blogging. Still, a couple of items caught my eye this morning.

First, The New York Times reports that, at long last, Congress and the White House are close to carving out a meaningful shield law to protect reporters against federal subpoenas.

Next, the AP has an interesting analysis on the atypical routes taken by several recent appointees, including newly minted Circuit Judge Malcolm Harrison, to Mississippi courts.

And last but not least, The National Law Journal takes note of congressional Democrats' continuing efforts to develop guidelines under which federal judges would be required to recuse themselves.

 Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this entry.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.