Great Moments in Mississippi Legal Writing

Speaking of Rule 702, Thursday's Hill v. Mills decision offers as good a reason as any to revisit my favorite expert-witness pull quote of all time:

"No expert is Daubert-proof. As science, like the law, evolves over time, one generation's expert is another's quack." Edmonds v. State, 955 So. 2d 787, ¶46 (Miss. 2007) (Diaz, P.J., specially concurring).

 Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • 2/2/2010 4:50 PM Patrick wrote:
    My all time personal favorite is:

    "Not only do I deny all the allegations in the above styled suit, I contend, with all due respect, that the plaintiff must be suffering from a condition of brown eyeballs since he is full of so much bullshit."

    Wheat v. Eakin, 491 So.2d 523 (Miss. 1986)
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.