Philip Thomas' View from the Top of the Hill
Though I am hesitant to beat a dead horse, Philip Thomas' analysis of last week's Hill v. Mills decision over at Mississippi Litigation Review (a Ye Olde Blogroll standby, for the record) is worth a read. His discussion is lengthy, but we agree that the Court seems to have had a fundamental misunderstanding of the Daubert standard.
Either way, of course, it represents a shift in Rule 702 jurisprudence. So, not unlike Thomas' write-up, it merits attention.
Comments